Tuesday, November 30, 2010

Emotional Control – Why Leaders Need It

I recently saw an Air Canada ad with the slogan, “Great Executives never get ruffled”. And while it’s a play on words it strikes a cord because emotional control in Leaders does matter. Here’s why:

Emotional Intelligence

Many business people are familiar with Daniel Goleman’s writings on Emotional Intelligence and understand that it’s a desirable trait/skill. The simple definition of Emotional Intelligence is the ability to recognize and regulate emotions both within the self and others. Why would that matter? It’s because leaders drive change via others. This can invoke questions about manipulation and morality. If one accepts that we’re governed by free-will then, manipulation is limited to influence and presumes that people cannot be controlled. When it comes to morality a useful model to think of is a teacher helping students to learn and better themselves and by extension, their community. Similarly business should serve those in the work force and community, the difference being income versus education. Morality matters because it fosters trust and is at the core of any important relationship but the caveat is nothing is perfect; there is no perfect student, teacher, business or leader. However, there are certainly gifted students, teachers and leaders. (A business can’t be gifted; it’s not an individual.)

It can be demonstrated that Emotional Intelligence is important from a sales perspective. As an example, would you buy from an angry sales person, or a sad one? The reality is that people buy to address their own needs and generally aren’t all that interested in the sales person. If a sales person is not focused on the prospect’s needs because they’re in the throes of an emotional response the probability of a sale is reduced. The reverse is also true. A sales person wants the prospect to be in the right frame of mind to buy. However, if the prospective buyer is wary of or does not respect the sales person then he/she won’t want to deal with them. And a salesperson very much needs to have a prospect’s attention to get them to make a purchase so if they’re having an argument with their spouse or child it’s a deterrent. A leader is in essence selling change and being able to encourage the prospect to be in a receptive frame of mind can greatly facilitate the process.

It seems relatively straightforward but when the psychologists talk about Emotional Intelligence it can seem quite complicated. Another benefit to Emotional Intelligence is when you’re not distracted by emotional noise it’s easier to stay on task which helps to reduce stress. Stress is a ’Catch 22’ in that it distracts you and that distraction can lead to increased stress.

Entitlement

Excerpt from article on rabble.ca titled, Narcissism, entitlement, aggression and rape By Colin Horgan, October 3, 2010

In their book, The Narcissism Epidemic, researchers Jean M. Twenge and W. Keith Campbell describe the rise of narcissistic characteristics throughout culture; traits like overall feelings of superiority, of being special and, crucially, of entitlement. Twenge and Campbell reviewed the results of Narcissistic Personality Inventory tests taken between 1979 and 2006 and revealed that: "College students in the 2000s were significantly more narcissistic than Gen Xers and Baby Boomer in the 1970s, '80s, and '90s.... By 2006, two-thirds of college students scored above the scale's original 1979-85 sample average, a 30 per cent increase in only two decades." They also note that the "upswing in narcissism appears to be accelerating." Additionally, Twenge and Campbell point out narcissism's relationship with aggression -- that is, contrary to the belief that if we like ourselves, we'll be kinder to others, narcissists "are aggressive exactly because they love themselves so much they believe that their needs take precedence." The rise of narcissism can be traced to a cultural shift driven by decades of parenting and education and, not surprisingly, by how narcissism has become celebrated in mass media. We've ended up with a generation of people convinced by both their parents and the culture industry that they are special and entitled to most things simply by virtue of being a desirable marketing demographic.

The “Narcissism Epidemic” describes a phenomenon that is disturbing. One aspect is that bullying is getting worse in schools, despite countless anti-bullying programs. And it suggests that the generations entering the work force are bringing their evolving narcissistic attitudes with them. So what to do about it?

I suggest that being able to effectively deal with conflict – in any context - has always been an under-rated skill and is getting more important every day.

Defusing Conflict - Active Listening = the Big Guns

Most people feel anxious when confronted with conflict. Our strong survival instinct typically invokes the fight or flight response which can be pretty appropriate when faced with a physical threat. As a general rule, violence is unlikely but it still can be challenging to stay calm enough to actively listen. And like most things in life, active listening gets easier with practice.

Active Listening effectively defuses conflict by focusing on and validating what a person is feeling. Feelings are facts. People frequently try to rationalize and convince others that they shouldn’t feel the way they do. It’s counter-productive and only adds frustration to an already volatile mix. To be able to say to someone, I see/understand/hear that you’re feeling “x” generally pulls them up short and just about all they can do is agree, although, sometimes it takes a few iterations. Validating doesn’t mean you “agree”, it means you “heard” them. Unfortunately, many people don’t know how effective this can be and even if they do, find it difficult to resist the urge to give in to being angry. To effectively avoid your own emotions you have to divert your focus and attention, hopefully to what others are feeling.

What to do about an inappropriate sense of Entitlement

It’s not a competition. Don’t engage in battle. Hopefully, “losing” isn’t something you’d wish on your worst enemy. Granted, this can be tough but the more you care about others the easier it is. I remember telling one employee the Tradesmen’s motto: Act surprised, show concern, ask for proof and deny everything. It’s a joke but the element of “showing concern” always has a positive effect. She agreed to try “showing concern” and said that, surprisingly, she actually felt concern. That was the point and for her it was major developmental progress. (A great book on this is, “The Anatomy of Peace” by the Arbinger Institute.)

Be clear and consistent about appropriate boundaries, which can be defined as the limits that allow for safe connections between individuals. Just because you listened doesn’t mean you have to give in. Don’t resort to rationalizing because that can be debated. Base it on your feelings because they can’t. It’s never up to someone else to decree how another feels. A useful context might be to visualize dealing with a small child: don’t react emotionally, care and actively listen, be clear and consistent and don’t expect it be easy. It can be a process that requires significant patience.

A temper tantrum without an audience dissolves quickly. Removing yourself from the situation can be very effective. If you find you can’t control your emotions then you can always come back later when you’re more able. But even if you do succumb slightly, actively listening can help you to defuse your own anger. Try it; you’ll be amazed at the results.

I recently met someone who described her run-in with a person with an inappropriate sense of entitlement as severely wounding. Its significance was so overwhelming that she was contemplating abandoning something she was really passionate about. Don’t let someone keep you from your passions. Don’t give bullies that kind of power. Active listening may help if the bully isn’t a sociopath but if they are avoidance may be a better tactic. If what you’re doing isn’t working then try something else until you find something that works.

Excerpt from What’s Wrong with a Healthy Sense of Entitlement? Donny Deutsch Has the Right Perspective by Kit Cooper - published May 5th, 2009

Donny Deutsch offers an interesting take on the sense of entitlement. To feel deserving of all the world has to offer but simultaneously not feeling entitled to success without doing what needs to be done.

Deutsch has accepted that he is no smarter than anyone else and no one else is smarter than him. For business, this translates to a huge competitive advantage in, a) building a corporate culture that is not just authentic but confident, and b) capitalizing on business development opportunities since you know that you can do anything that your competitors can do.

7 comments:

  1. It's a long blog with plenty of room for comment; maybe I'll add more later. But for now I'll just focus on paragraph 1. To presume that "people cannot be controlled" may be a fair statement, but people are most certainly steered, driven or, depending on the size of the carrot, manipulated for desired results. Perhaps I'm too carnivorous to appreciate the teacher/student illustration as related to business and the assumed altruism. Hopefully most teachers are in it for the betterment of the student and "by extension, the community", though my cynical self wonders about the actual percentage of those, in our self-focused society today. Business, on the other hand, need suffer no such compunction. The landscape is littered with shuttered offices and warehouses formerly staffed by genteel do-gooders who thought, wrongly, that their jobs were to somehow enhance "the community". Good corporate citizens obviously reinvest in their communities and, at least for appearance sake, seem to be giving back. But that's not their job! Businesses exist to trade their products or services for profit, upon which taxes are levied. Yes, "Morality Matters". But who enforces it? Government agencies exist, sadly, to extract in ever larger amounts, taxes imposed on the efforts, creativity and profitable operation of business; which is then typically squandered under the guise of 'good works for the community'. Profit from successful business operation, like water, finds its own level, based on intelligence, effort, output, integrity and a host of noble qualities. Get the crooks, dolts, posers and procrastinators out of government, and communities will flourish all on their own. I'll try to sum up with an illustration from a few years back that not only highlights the issue, but at the same time questions your statement (tongue in cheek) that a "business can't be gifted". In 1997 then Prime Minister Jean Chretien led, influenced or manipulated the Federal Business Development Bank to first loan Yvon Duhaime $615,000, and then to GRANT an additional $164,000, so the partners could expand a hotel on their golf course. Since the 164K was a GRANT, I say the "Business was Gifted"! (Tongue in cheek, of course) So-called Shawinigate aptly illustrates that, while we may not be able to 'control' people, we should try much harder to control politicians!

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's a long comment! There are lots of crooks out there including at least some politicians. Here's the thing: who trusts a politician? I'm guessing not many. Do you want to deal with them? I don't. I consider it a waste of time. Even the golden child Obama, who represented hope for so many, is now feeling the backlash of the disappointed. (Who could have lived up to those expectations?) And I think Obama truly is a cut above the average politician (gifted if you like). I speculate that he ran because he had a cause: to be the 1st racially diverse president and not just for the power. Too bad for America because it'll likely be a long time before someone as "gifted" runs again. I also think he's a good example of someone with high emotional intelligence. I believe his motivations where mostly altruistic and hence why so many trust/trusted him. He's great at "controlling" his emotions and he's obviously good at influencing others: case in point. Is he perfect? Does that guarantee success? Nope.

    ReplyDelete
  3. There are politicians I trust, but as Reagan famously said to Gorbachev; "Trust but verify!" Every attempt at verification of President Obama's closest friends, advisors, czars and cabinet appointments (vetted?) reveals an astonishing lack of ethics &/or credibility (to put it charitably). Then you read Obama's background and how he was raised to be a poster boy for anti-colonialism (see Roots of Obama's Rage) and you get a better sense of why his first act upon taking office was to thumb his nose at the U.S.'s closest ally for the last century, England, and return the bust of Churchill. No doubt stemming from his birth father's contempt for the monarchy.
    Altruistic motivations? I'm not so sure. Here's a little test. Altruism is typically an issue of the heart. You detect someone's passion about a particular issue as they speak from their heart; no notes are needed because they feel so strongly about the issue. Obama is often teased by the media for his demonstrated dependence on the ever-present teleprompter, including the time he spoke to 6th grade elementary school children. If one's motives are so altruistic, you would think he could come up with something heartfelt to say to a bunch of primary grade school kids, rather than relying on notes hastily cribbed by his constant coterie of advisors. The reason 'so many trust/trusted him' is, I believe, because they were projecting qualities onto a mere mortal that were/are impossible to live up to. A man who had never run a business, never made a payroll, never negotiated a contract, never created a job (except for short-term volunteer positions paid for by donations) was suddenly elected to the highest office in the land. The only smart thing he could have done at that point was to humbly admit how 'in over his head' he was and immediately begin calling out to God for divine intervention. Except that, for the last 20 years, for his marriage and for the dedication of both his children, Obama sat under the misguided ministry of Jeremiah Wright, the self-proclaimed bishop of 'black' liberation theology. Something I have yet to find chapter and verse for in my Bible.
    O.K., I'll concede your last point. He's not perfect. What you now need to think about and ultimately decide is, if you were American, would he honestly be worth your support? More than half said "uh-uh" in the mid-term election. Just wait for 2012!

    ReplyDelete
  4. “Trust but verify” is one of favourite quotes. I think it speaks to the need not to be naive but also suggests needing the strength to deal with what may. (I don't like the victim mentality.) And thank you for detailing Mr. Obama's short comings: interesting. Bottom line: altruism, morality and ethics foster trust which is important in any enduring relationship.

    I think it’s typical for most politicians to fall from grace and why they get voted out. Most people are fickle enough to get seduced by the next best thing and maybe it’s a good thing. It demonstrates how demanding and transient relationships can be. Even Mississauga’s beloved Hazel McCallion endured significant attacks during her last campaign. I think there’s a cycle to most relationships: honeymoon, disillusionment, power struggle, and maybe after a lot of hard work sometimes commitment and synergy. I think you could add more or define it differently and I’m sure most psychologists would but hopefully, you get the point. Along the same lines Cog’s ladder group dynamic stages are: Polite stage, We’re here stage, Power stage, Cooperation stage, Espirit Stage. Or From Dr. Bruce Tuckman: Forming, Storming, Norming, Performing. I’d suggest the crux of the matter is: relationships are hard, but truly caring is what makes them endure and be truly meaningful. Unfortunately, most people don’t know how and/or won’t make the effort. The good news: there’s lots of opportunity for improvement.

    ReplyDelete
  5. If it is 'typical' why exactly do politicians 'fall from grace' and 'get voted out'? I suspect because most of them say what is necessary to get elected; then alter their agenda to fit reality once elected. Obama, on the other hand, may be one of the most virtuous of recently elected politicians. It was obvious to some from the get-go that his plan was to socialize America to look and feel more like a 'have-not' nation, forever apologizing to 3rd world thugs for the former halcyon days of American hegemony. The problem with such a plan is, it costs money to be the world's policeman. Lots of money! And for anyone to seriously argue that the US has NOT been the greatest force for good in the civilized world is to deny the obvious. But Barak, like Hazel, is now operating by instinct and desperately trying to fulfill 'Dreams FROM (not of) My Father' in one short 4-year term. Hazel, in trying to shield her gold-digger son from media scrutiny, did what any mother would do. And Barak, in like fashion, is doing what any Chicago 'Community Organizer' would do, only faster and with more tragic results! For a clearer picture see: http://www.redstate.com/laborunionreport/2010/12/05/a-death-by-a-thousand-cuts/

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm not sure that the U.S. should be the world's police. It gives them too much responsibility/power. It should be the UN's job and yet they appear ineffective. Which I suppose could start a whole debate about leadership by committee. For arguments sake, let's just assume it's not a good model, even though I know a lot of Lawyers would argue the importance of due process but lawyers don't generally have a huge stake in the outcome, i.e., I'd suggest the problem with the UN is that the constituents have a hard time being objective.

    And maybe the U.S. should be more socialistic: more like Canada! I happen to think Canada is an amazing country and would much rather live here than there.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Canada IS an amazing country, but not because of it's socialism. I am appalled at the amount of money taken from private citizens and businesses to fund an entirely inefficient and grossly wasteful healthcare system. Average wait time today for surgery has risen to 18.2 weeks; that's more than 127 days! (See Fraser Institute 'Waiting Your Turn' report for 2010) No wonder medical tourism is the fastest growing segment of the travel industry. There is only one thing more urgent than medical attention; that is, FOOD. Yet we do not, as yet anyway, require everyone to buy groceries at Loblaws, or Dominion, or Food Basics. Those days may be coming if we continue to look to Government as the solution to all mankind's challenges. And following that, who knows? Will we opt for gov't. subsidized (read gov't. controlled) vehicles; gov't. subsidized houses, gov't. subsidized haircuts? Why should some people be able to buy groceries at Pusateri's while other people are forced to bargain hunt for food at No Frills? Why should some people be able to pay $75 for perfectly coiffured hair, while others have to accept the frazzled look available only at SuperCuts? There is only 1 reason; some people work hard, save their money, invest wisely and plan for their futures. These are the very people who pay the bulk of the taxes and fund the vaunted Canadian Healthcare system that covers everyone, regardless how badly that system is abused. There is a solution and it's not difficult, except that bureaucrats make it seem difficult, no doubt in order to maintain their cushy pencil-pushing positions a little longer. Catastrophic coverage must, in any 'civilized' country be available for everyone and we can fund that. But for everything else, there must be tiers of healthcare available to those who can afford it, the same as their is for vehicle choice, groceries and haircuts. At least for now, but who knows?

    ReplyDelete